The Role of Writing in Student Strategy Development

In 2003, the National Commission on Writing released its landmark report, The Neglected “R”: The Need for a Writing Revolution, calling for a national shift to prioritize writing in American education. The report underscores a crucial truth for teachers: effective writing instruction isn’t an add-on—it’s central to equipping students for success in life and work. Writing impacts not only academic achievement but also economic mobility and critical thinking.

This blog will highlight key findings from the report, translating them into actionable insights for teachers shaping the next generation of writers. But first of all, let’s answer the question, why writing matters, through the lens of SRSD researcher Debra McKeown, and her TED Talk-styled video:

The Case for a Writing Revolution

Writing is more than a school subject; it’s a skill that shapes how students connect ideas, analyze information, and communicate effectively. Yet, according to the Commission, writing remains the most neglected of the “three Rs” (reading, ’riting, and ’rithmetic). The time devoted to writing in schools is insufficient, leaving students ill-prepared for college and the workforce.

Neglecting writing isn’t just an educational oversight; it’s a missed opportunity to empower students. In surveys cited by the report, over 90% of mid-career professionals identified writing as a crucial skill in their day-to-day work. Writing proficiency opens doors to employment, career advancement, and meaningful civic engagement.

This data highlights a call to action for teachers: writing instruction must be reimagined as a priority across all grade levels and disciplines.

Top 5 Reasons Why Writing Matters

The Commission emphasizes writing as a means of learning and discovery.

• Enhances Communication Skills
  Writing is a foundational tool for clear and effective communication. It enables students to articulate their thoughts, share ideas, and convey information in a structured and impactful way. Strong writing skills are crucial for personal, academic, and professional success.

• Critical for Academic Achievement
  Writing is central to learning across all subjects. It helps students analyze information, synthesize ideas, and demonstrate understanding. Research shows that writing across the curriculum improves writing ability and comprehension of other subjects, making it essential for educational success.

• Boosts Career Opportunities
  Effective writing is a highly sought-after skill in the workforce. From crafting emails to preparing reports, professionals rely on writing to collaborate, persuade, and execute projects. Employers consistently rank communication skills, including writing, among the most essential competencies for career advancement.

• Supports Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving
  Writing encourages students to organize their thoughts, evaluate evidence, and draw conclusions. By engaging in the writing process, students develop the ability to think critically and solve problems—skills invaluable in academic and real-world contexts.

• Empowers Personal Growth and Expression
  Writing is a powerful medium for self-expression and creativity. It allows students to explore their thoughts, share experiences, and connect with others. Beyond academics, writing can be therapeutic, helping individuals reflect on challenges and find clarity in their emotions.

By integrating writing into every subject, teachers can help students see its relevance and build skills that extend beyond the classroom.

Challenges to Writing Instruction

The Commission identifies several barriers that teachers face in delivering effective writing instruction:

1. Limited Time: Writing is labor-intensive for both students and teachers. The report calls for doubling the time students spend on writing assignments, but the reality is that many educators need to be stretched thin.

2. Professional Development Gaps: Many teachers need more training in writing instruction, a crucial component of effective pedagogy. As a result, even experienced educators may feel unequipped to teach writing with confidence.

3. Assessment Hurdles: Writing assessments often focus on mechanics rather than substance, and standardized tests rarely capture the depth of students’ abilities.

4. Technology Integration: While digital tools offer opportunities for collaboration and feedback, many schools need more resources to integrate technology effectively into writing instruction.

Addressing these challenges requires systemic support and creative solutions at the classroom level.

Strategies for Teachers

The Commission’s recommendations provide a roadmap for teachers looking to enhance their writing instruction through effective writing strategies. Here’s how to bring these ideas to life in your classroom:

1. Make Writing a Daily Practice

• Encourage students to write daily, even for a few minutes. Journals, quick writes, and exit tickets are easy ways to incorporate writing into any subject.
• Assign meaningful writing tasks that go beyond rote exercises. For example, ask students to write a persuasive letter about a community issue or reflect on a science experiment.

2. Embed Writing Across the Curriculum

• Writing isn’t just for English class. Use writing to deepen learning in math, science, history, and art. For instance, have students explain their problem-solving process in math or analyze primary historical sources.
• Collaborate with colleagues to develop interdisciplinary writing projects, such as research papers that combine social studies and environmental science.

3. Provide Meaningful Feedback

• Shift the focus from editing for grammar to coaching students on ideas, structure, and voice. Praise what they do well before suggesting improvements.
• Use peer reviews and conferences to create a collaborative writing culture in your classroom.

4. Leverage Technology

• Introduce students to tools like Google Docs for drafting and revising or platforms like Grammarly for self-editing. These tools can save time and empower students to take ownership of their writing.
• Experiment with multimedia writing assignments, such as creating digital stories or blogs, to engage students and broaden their understanding of writing possibilities.

5. Commit to Ongoing Professional Growth

• Seek workshops, webinars, and writing communities to build expertise and refine your teaching methodology. The National Writing Project, for example, offers opportunities to collaborate with fellow educators and refine your approach to teaching writing.
• Take time to write yourself. Experiencing firsthand the challenges and rewards of writing will make you a more empathetic and effective teacher.

The Role of Assessment

The Commission advocates for authentic assessments, allowing students to demonstrate their skills through writing tasks. Here’s what that might look like in your classroom:

• Portfolio-Based Assessments: Encourage students to compile a writing and literacy development portfolio, showcasing their growth over time. Include drafts, revisions, and final pieces to emphasize the writing process.

• Rubrics for Clarity: Develop rubrics focusing on content, organization, voice, grammar, and mechanics. Share these rubrics with students so they understand how their work will be evaluated.

• Time to Write: Whenever possible, give students the time to plan, write, and revise. Authentic assessment takes time, but it’s worth the investment in students’ development.

Building a Culture of Writing

Creating a writing revolution starts with shifting classroom culture. Celebrate writing as a vital skill and a form of self-expression. Share examples of excellent writing from literature, history, and even student work. Most importantly, show students that their voices matter.

When students see writing as more than an assignment—a tool for discovery, persuasion, and connection—and apply effective writing strategies, they’ll be motivated to improve. And when teachers are equipped with the right strategy and support, they can guide students to become confident, capable writers.

A Call to Action

The National Commission on Writing’s vision remains as relevant today as it was in 2003. To close the gap between the skills students have and the skills they need, writing must become a national priority—and a classroom staple.

For teachers, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. By integrating writing into daily instruction, advocating for professional development, and using creative assessments, we can ignite a writing revolution that prepares students for school, work, and life success.

Writing isn’t just a skill; it’s a pathway to opportunity. Let’s help our students seize it.

References

1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2002-2003. Washington: Government Printing Office, 2002. 
2. Light, Richard J. Making the Most of College. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
3. National Commission on the High School Senior Year. Raising Our Sights. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, July 2001.
4. National Institute of Education. Becoming a Nation of Readers. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, 1985.
5. Center for Survey Research & Analysis. History Research Paper Study. November 2002.
6. The College Board. Ten-Year Trend in SAT Scores Indicates Increased Emphasis on Math Is Yielding Results; Reading and Writing Are Causes for Concern. Princeton, NJ: College Entrance Examination Board, 2002.
7. Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates of the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California. Academic Literacy: A Statement of Competencies Expected of Students Entering California’s Public Colleges and Universities. Sacramento: ICAS, 2002.
8. The Chronicle of Higher Education. “Why Johnny Can’t Write, Even Though He Went to Princeton.” January 3, 2003.
9. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. The NAEP 1998 Writing Report Card for the Nation and the States. 
10. National Council of Teachers of English. Writing Assessment: A Position Statement, 2002.

Engaging Young Writers: Practical Tips and Activities

In a groundbreaking study, Yes. They Can: Developing transcription skills and oral language in tandem with SRSD instruction on close reading of science text to write informative essays at grades 1 and 2, published in the research journal Contemporary Educational Psychology, Harris et al. (2023) explored the transformative potential of combining Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) with explicit instruction in transcription and oral language skills, plus close reading of science texts for first and second-graders.

The study was conducted with students in a high-poverty school. It is the first to investigate whether young children should learn foundational skills before learning to compose a written text. The findings demonstrated significant improvements in writing quality, planning, vocabulary, and structural elements of students’ essays, showcasing the power of evidence-based, multi-component instruction to elevate early literacy outcomes. These results provide a compelling case for integrating writing process instruction with skills-based approaches in primary classrooms, addressing critical gaps in early literacy education.

Introduction

Writing is a critical skill that is the foundation for academic success, personal development, and future career opportunities. Despite its importance, writing instruction, including instructional opportunities at the early grade levels, is often lacking. There have been ongoing debates and questions about whether students should learn transcription and oral language skills before learning skills for writing. However, “Yes, They Can…” demonstrates that combining skills with effective writing strategies and instruction yields remarkable results, even in first and second-grade classrooms.

Why Focus on Young Writers?

The early grades are pivotal for developing literacy skills, but insufficient instruction can affect students in the long term. Data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) highlights concerning trends. Only 27% of U.S. eighth and twelfth graders perform at or above the proficient level in writing, with significant disparities among students from underserved communities. Similarly, many students struggle with reading comprehension, which is intricately linked to writing success. The NAEP reading data: 34% of fourth graders scored below basic, and only 35% scored at or above proficient. For 8th graders, 27% scored below basic, and only 34% scored at or above proficient.

Addressing these challenges requires integrating evidence-based practices, such as SRSD, into early writing instruction. SRSD’s structured approach helps students develop self-regulation, planning, and writing strategies, laying a strong foundation for lifelong literacy.

Overview of the Study

The randomized controlled trial included 93 first- and second-grade students from a high-poverty school. Participants were randomly assigned to either the “SRSD Plus” group or a control group with typical writing instruction (writers’ workshop in this case). Over 10 weeks, students in the SRSD Plus group received instruction three times per week for 45 minutes per session. Key components of SRSD Plus included:

• SRSD for Writing: Strategies for planning, composing, and revising informative essays, supported by close reading of science texts aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).
• Transcription Skills: Explicit instruction in handwriting and spelling to enhance fluency.
• Vocabulary and Sentence Structure: Focused activities to build tier 2 and content-specific vocabulary and sentence proficiency activities, including combining and completion.
•  

Key Findings

This graph shows the positive impact of SRSD (Self-Regulated Strategy Development) instruction on various writing-related skills for elementary students. The bars represent the effect sizes for different outcomes, with a higher effect size indicating a more substantial improvement. Vocabulary showed the most prominent effect (2.29), demonstrating significant gains in students’ word knowledge and use. Planning effectiveness (1.40), transition words (1.33), and spelling (1.18) also showed substantial improvements. Writing quality improved by an effect size of 1.02, and writing productivity saw a more minor but meaningful boost (0.82). The structural elements of writing, like organizing essays, showed the smallest gain (0.29), indicating this may require further focus.

The study’s results showcase the transformative impact of SRSD Plus on young learners:

Improved Writing Quality: Students in the SRSD Plus group achieved significantly higher writing quality scores than their peers, with an effect size of 1.02. First graders in the intervention group produced writing that matched the quality of second graders in the control group, indicating a substantial improvement in writing quality.

Enhanced Writing Productivity: Students in the SRSD Plus group wrote longer, more detailed compositions. First graders increased their average word count from 16 to 52 words per composition. Second graders wrote nearly twice as many words as their control group peers.

Mastery of Structural Elements: The intervention significantly improved students’ use of structural elements, such as topic sentences, big ideas, and conclusions, aligning with Common Core State Standards (CCSS) expectations.

Stronger Vocabulary and Sentence Proficiency: The focus on Tier 2 vocabulary (high-utility words) and complex sentence structures led to measurable gains:

            a. Vocabulary Effect Size: 2.29 (large effect).

            b. Sentence Proficiency Effect Size: 0.29 (moderate effect).

Effective Planning Skills: Students learned to create detailed, goal-oriented plans for their writing. These plans included key ideas, supporting details, and organizational notes with a very large 1.40 effect size.

Reading-Writing Integration: By closely reading science texts, students improved their ability to extract key ideas and use them effectively in their writing, utilizing available resources to enhance their learning process. This integration of reading and writing supports comprehension and content learning.

Breaking Barriers in Early Writing Instruction

This study addresses longstanding debates about whether elementary students can handle the cognitive demands of integrating transcription, oral language, and writing strategies. The findings demonstrate that:

• Cognitive Overload Concerns are Unfounded: Young learners can successfully manage these complex tasks with proper scaffolding and support.
• Equity in Literacy Instruction is Achievable: SRSD Plus provided a structured approach to meet the needs of all students and gave them access to evidence-based, effective literacy instruction.

Practical Implications for Teachers

For educators, the study offers clear guidance on implementing SRSD techniques and writing strategies for elementary students to support early writing development:

Explicit and Systematic Instruction: Integrate curriculum-aligned content by breaking down complex tasks into manageable steps, guiding students through each stage of the writing process.

Integration of Reading and Writing: Students should read informational texts closely to build content knowledge and provide a basis for writing tasks.

Scaffolded Learning: Gradually release responsibility to students after providing explicit modeling, allowing them to develop independence while maintaining high expectations.

Frequent Practice: Provide regular opportunities and resources for students to write, plan, and revise their work, emphasizing the importance of engagement, perseverance, and self-regulation throughout the writing process.

Combine Skills Instruction with Compositional Instruction: Incorporate activities that build handwriting fluency, spelling accuracy, vocabulary, and sentence complexity alongside strategic instruction for writing.

Conclusion

The study by Dr. Karen Harris and colleagues underscores the power of SRSD and writing strategies for elementary students to unlock young learners’ writing potential. By integrating evidence-based practices for reading, writing, and skills instruction in a content area, educators can empower their students to become confident, skilled writers who excel academically and beyond. For teachers seeking to make a lasting impact, SRSD provides a proven framework for fostering success in the classroom and beyond.

A Proven Writing Strategy for the Classroom

Writing can be a challenging task for many students, particularly those with learning disabilities (LD) or autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Traditional methods of teaching writing often fall short of addressing the unique needs of struggling writers. However, a study by Katie M. Miller and Mary E. Little, published in Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal (2017), provides compelling evidence that combining Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) with Video Self-Modeling (VSM) can significantly improve students’ writing skills. This blog will explore the key findings from the study and offer practical steps for implementing VSM alongside SRSD in your classroom.

Why Writing Instruction Needs a Boost

Writing is an essential tool for communication, learning, and self-expression. For students in school, writing provides a concrete measure of their understanding and a means to demonstrate knowledge. Yet, many students, particularly those with LD or autism, struggle with key aspects of the writing process, such as planning, organizing, drafting, revising, and editing.

Research shows that students with LD often have limited skills in planning their writing and understanding the features of good writing (Graham & Harris, 2009). They may also lack motivation and confidence in their writing abilities, making it even harder for them to succeed without a positive self-review of their progress. This is where SRSD and VSM combine to provide the support they need to thrive.

What is Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD)?

SRSD, developed by Dr. Karen Harris and Dr. Steve Graham, is a well-researched, evidence-based framework for teaching writing. It focuses on helping students learn strategies for planning, drafting, revising, and self-regulating their writing process. One of the popular mnemonics used in SRSD for opinion writing is POW + TREE:

• POW: Pick my idea, Organize my notes, Write and say more
• TREE: Topic sentence, Reasons, Examples, Ending

SRSD also emphasizes self-regulation techniques such as goal setting, self-monitoring, self-instruction, and self-reinforcement, all of which empower students to take control of their writing process.

What is Video Self-Modeling (VSM)?

VSM is a technique grounded in evidence-based practice, where students watch videos of themselves completing a task. The videos show students performing skills they may not yet be able to independently but can do so with support. This “future model of success” helps students visualize themselves succeeding, which boosts their confidence and motivation.

The feedforward method used in VSM involves recording students with scaffolds (e.g., prompts, guides) and then editing out those supports. The final video shows the student performing the task independently, providing a powerful visual reinforcement of their potential and utilizing self-modeling to enhance their skills.

The Study: SRSD + VSM for Third-Grade Students with LD

In their 2017 study, Miller and Little examined the effects of combining SRSD with VSM on the writing performance of three third-grade students with learning disabilities. The researchers used a multiple probe across participants design to measure various aspects of writing, including the number of essay elements, length of essays, and time spent writing.

Key Findings:

• Improved Essay Elements: All students increased the number of opinion essay elements (topic sentence, reasons, examples, and ending) in their writing. For example, one student, Marie, went from writing three essay elements during the baseline phase to ten elements during the intervention phase.
• Increased Essay Length: Two students wrote longer essays after the intervention. Marie’s essay length increased from an average of 21 words in the baseline phase to 62 words during the intervention.
• Retention of Skills: Students who received a VSM booster session retained their writing skills at mastery levels during the maintenance phase due to the effective interventions. For example, Bree received a booster session and maintained her essay elements score.
• Increased Writing Time: All students engaged more in writing after the intervention, showing increased focus and effort during writing tasks.

Why VSM is a Game-Changer in Writing Instruction

The combination of SRSD and VSM addresses two critical barriers to writing success: lack of strategy knowledge and low self-efficacy. Here’s why VSM is so effective:

1. Boosts Confidence: Students see themselves succeeding, which builds their belief in their abilities.
2. Provides a Clear Model: VSM shows students precisely what success looks like, helping them internalize the steps needed to achieve it.
3. Reduces Anxiety: Seeing a video of themselves succeeding can reduce students’ anxiety about writing tasks.
4. Promotes Self-Regulation: VSM helps students take ownership of their learning by reinforcing self-monitoring and goal-setting behaviors.

Practical Steps for Using VSM in Your Classroom

1. Identify the Writing Strategy: Start by teaching a specific writing strategy, such as POW + TREE, using the SRSD framework.
2. Record the Student: Once the student is familiar with the strategy, record a video of them using it successfully. For example, you can record them completing a graphic organizer or explaining their essay plan.
3. Edit the Video: Remove any scaffolds or prompts provided during the recording. The final video should show the student completing the task independently.
4. Watch the Video: Have the student watch their self-modeling video at the start of each writing session to reinforce their learning.
5. Provide Booster Sessions: If a student’s performance declines offer a booster session where they watch their video again to refresh their memory and confidence.

Real-Life Example: Bree’s Story

Bree, one of the students in the study, struggled with generating ideas and organizing her thoughts, illustrating how psychology principles can be applied to improve cognitive processes. After participating in SRSD lessons and watching her VSM video, she improved significantly, highlighting the importance of task analysis in understanding and executing writing strategies. Bree began using self-statements like, “I can do this!” and could write more structured essays with better content. When her performance dropped, a quick booster session with her VSM video returned her to mastery levels.

Addressing Teacher Concerns

Concern 1: I don’t have time to create videos for every student.

• Solution: Start small by creating videos for a few students who need the most support. As you become more comfortable with the process, you can expand.

Concern 2: I don’t have the technology.

• Solution: Most smartphones and tablets have built-in cameras and simple editing tools. There’s no need for fancy equipment.

Concern 3: Will this work for all students?

• Solution: While the study focused on students with LD, VSM can be beneficial for all students, especially those with autism or those who struggle with confidence or motivation.

The Bigger Picture: Transforming Writing Instruction

Incorporating VSM and self-modeling into your writing instruction can create a more supportive and engaging learning environment. Students will learn writing strategies and develop the confidence to use them independently. The combination of SRSD and VSM provides a powerful tool for helping students become more self-regulated, motivated, and successful writers.

Final Thoughts

The study by Miller and Little shows that combining SRSD with VSM effectively improves writing outcomes for students with learning disabilities. However, the benefits of VSM go beyond this specific population. All students can benefit from seeing themselves succeed. As educators, we have the power to help students unlock their potential by providing them with tools and strategies that build both skills and confidence.

Start small, conduct a positive self-review, and watch how a simple video can transform a student’s approach to writing. The results may surprise you.

Citation: Miller, K. M., & Little, M. E. (2017). Examining the Effects of SRSD in Combination with Video Self-Modeling on Writing by Third-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal. doi:10.1080/09362835.2017.1283622

Two Years in the Making: Unveiling the Future of SRSD Writing Strategy Instruction

SRSD Online is excited to unveil our fully redesigned teacher training courses and website, offering educators and schools worldwide access to evidence-based writing instruction grounded in the Science of Writing. Our transformation is focused on delivering the most effective, engaging, and accessible professional development in Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD). Whether you’re an experienced SRSD practitioner or exploring evidence-based writing instruction for the first time, SRSDOnline.com is your destination for innovative resources, groundbreaking training, and cutting-edge materials to transform education, teaching, and writing outcomes in your school or district.

New SRSD Online Training

We’ve added exciting new online course features and expanded offerings to make SRSD more accessible and impactful for individual educators and groups. We’ve reimagined SRSD online training, particularly our Instructional Coach training and K-5 and Secondary Educator courses. Built from the ground up, with input from SRSD creator Karen Harris as well as Steve Graham and top SRSD researchers, our programs are designed to meet the diverse needs of educators at every level.

Reinvented Instructional Coach Training

Our two-year “Train-the-Trainer” SRSD Master Class is a standout feature. This advanced training immerses instructional coaches in evidence-based strategies through:

• Synchronous Training: Live Zoom sessions with SRSD classroom experts and researchers.
• Course Access: Full access to our Writing to Learn™ course and instructional coach materials for continuous reference.
• Mentorship and Support: Two years of  synchronous and on-demand mentoring, guidance from SRSD professionals, and ample resources to aid your journey.
• Practice-Based Learning: Hands-on activities designed to prepare coaches to lead impactful teacher training sessions.
• Customizable Implementation: Pre-program planning to tailor SRSD to your school’s curriculum.

Upon completion, Instructional Coaches will be ready to mentor educators, ensure fidelity in SRSD implementation, and confidently lead writing instruction initiatives.

Brand-New K-5 and Secondary Teacher Courses

We’re thrilled to introduce our new K-5 and secondary online SRSD teacher courses for genre-based writing. These courses have been redesigned to equip educators with the confidence and expertise needed to implement SRSD effectively at any grade level, ensuring transformative writing instruction for all students, including those with learning disabilities.

• Evidence-Based Learning: Rooted in decades of classroom research and proven methodologies.
• Classroom modeling videos, explicit lesson plans, and actionable strategies.
• Flexibility: Self-paced modules that fit into the busiest of schedules.

K-1 SRSD Content: Supporting Early Learners

For the youngest writers, our innovative K-1 SRSD content comprises supplemental materials and adaptations to focus on the foundational skills children need to excel in later grades. Our program emphasizes verbal instruction and drawing, enabling early learners to develop their ideas visually and verbally, while building their background knowledge in genre-based terms and concepts. By prioritizing language development and self-expression, this training lays a strong foundation for genre-based writing, ensuring that students have the confidence and skills to flourish in their writing journeys by second grade.

SRSD Training for Students with Learning Disabilities

Understanding the unique challenges of teaching students with learning disabilities, we have designed our courses to support educators in this critical work. These sessions highlight SRSD’s proven strengths in fostering metacognition, goal-setting, and self-regulation skills, while offering a deep dive into the SRSD framework. Our training addresses learners’ diverse needs and abilities, equipping teachers with effective strategies in self-regulation to overcome challenges and leverage student strengths. Through interactive modules, hands-on activities, and ongoing mentorship from expert SRSD researchers, you’ll gain the skills and confidence to deliver personalized, impactful writing instruction tailored to every student.

Customized Group Training from Pilots to Districtwide Programs

Whether you choose our one-year Pilot, Whole School/District Adoption, or Train-the-Trainer group program for Instructional Coaches, each option is designed to deliver fiscally responsible solutions that improve student achievement. Through synchronous Zoom training with our SRSD researchers, our group programs integrate SRSD strategies across your entire school community with advanced training and access to resources that ensure lasting improvements. With SRSD Online group training, you’ll gain the tools, support, and flexibility needed to transform writing instruction and achieve meaningful, lasting results for your students.

SRSD Writing for Pre-Service Teachers

Prepare future educators to revolutionize writing instruction with our SRSD Pre-Service Teaching Writing Program, a comprehensive, evidence-based K-12 genre-based composition course designed for university students in teacher preparation programs. Professors benefit from a turnkey solution with ready-to-use instructional materials, assessments, and expert guidance. They will also have access to student course progress and self-assessment analytics. Future teachers graduate with advanced writing instruction skills, setting themselves apart in the job market and ensuring their students thrive as confident, capable writers. This program is more than an addition to teacher preparation—it’s a foundation for lasting success in the classroom.

New SRSD Website

Our brand new SRSDOnline.org website is your one-stop hub for everything related to Self-Regulated Strategy Development. Explore a wealth of free resources, including downloadable materials and informative articles designed to support your SRSD journey. Dive deep into the research behind SRSD with our extensive library of studies and publications. Whether you’re a seasoned SRSD practitioner or just starting, SRSD Online has everything you need to empower yourself and your students. 

New SRSD Research Library

Discover the unparalleled effectiveness of Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) through our extensive library of SRSD research studies and meta-analyses available at SRSDOnline.org/research. SRSD is the world’s most thoroughly studied, evidence-based writing approach, with decades of research proving its transformative impact on student outcomes. From improving writing skills and comprehension to fostering critical thinking, SRSD’s explicit strategies help students organize their thoughts, master genre-based writing, and build confidence in their abilities. Whether seeking evidence to advocate for SRSD in your school or aiming to deepen your understanding of its proven methods, our comprehensive research library is your ultimate resource.

Take the Next Step

We invite you to explore the new SRSDOnline.org today! Whether searching for free tools, diving into the latest research, or enrolling in our training programs, our mission is to revolutionize writing instruction and help you transform student outcomes through SRSD and the Science of Writing.

A Powerful Tool to Meet Common Core Standards for Diverse Learners 

The study “Answering the Challenge: SRSD Instruction for Close Reading of Text to Write to Persuade with 4th and 5th Grade Students Experiencing Writing Difficulties” by Karen R. Harris, Amber Ray, Steve Graham, and Julia Houston focuses on a critical challenge in today’s classrooms: teaching students to write persuasive essays based on close reading of informational texts. This research is particularly relevant for classroom teachers working with upper elementary students who struggle with persuasive writing, as it provides strategies tailored to engage the audience effectively. 

This study demonstrates how SRSD (Self-Regulated Strategy Development) effectively equips 4th and 5th-grade students experiencing writing difficulties to craft persuasive essays by integrating close reading strategies (TWA) with a structured writing approach (POW+TREE). Students showed meaningful improvements in planning, incorporating genre elements, and overall writing quality, even when working with challenging source texts. The findings highlight that SRSD boosts writing skills and fosters confidence and independence, making it a powerful tool for educators aiming to meet Common Core standards while supporting diverse learners.

The Challenge of Teaching Persuasive Writing

Teaching persuasive writing in today’s classrooms presents a significant challenge, particularly when integrating the close reading of informational texts. The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) have raised the bar, requiring 4^th– and 5^th-grade students to craft logical, evidence-based arguments. These expectations demand that students read closely and transform what they read into structured, compelling essays. This task is daunting for many students, especially those experiencing writing difficulties. The complexity of persuasive writing—requiring clear reasoning, relevant evidence, and strong organization—leaves many students struggling to meet the standards.

The hurdles are equally significant for teachers, as they must find effective examples to demonstrate writing strategies. A 2012 survey revealed that many teachers feel inadequately prepared to teach writing effectively, especially in low-income schools where resources are limited, and students need additional barriers. Balancing the dual demands of reading comprehension and writing proficiency within classroom time constraints is a perennial concern. Enter Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD): an evidence-based approach that empowers struggling writers and meets today’s rigorous academic demands.

SRSD: A Research-Backed Solution for Writing Success

SRSD, or Self-Regulated Strategy Development, is an evidence-based instructional model that equips students with the tools and strategies to tackle complex writing tasks confidently. Developed by Dr. Karen Harris and Dr. Steve Graham, SRSD focuses on integrating cognitive, behavioral, and metacognitive strategies into the writing process. The approach is rooted in teaching students to plan, write, and revise their work while regulating their emotions, motivation, and writing behaviors.

In their 2019 study, Harris and her colleagues explored the power of SRSD to teach persuasive writing and enhance persuasion skills in 4th and 5th-grade students in a low-income school. These students, identified as struggling writers, made remarkable progress in writing quality and strategy use. The study integrated close reading of informational texts with persuasive writing instruction, aligning seamlessly with CCSS goals. The results? Transformative gains in writing performance, planning complexity, and overall confidence—proving that even students facing significant challenges can excel with the proper support.

How SRSD Works: POW+TREE and TWA in Action

SRSD instruction is grounded in scaffolding and gradual release, enabling students to take ownership of their learning. The process involves six recursive stages: Develop Background Knowledge, Discuss It, Model It, Memorize It, Support It, and Independent Performance. These stages empower students to internalize strategies and apply them independently.

1. Writing Strategies: POW+TREE To guide students through the persuasive writing process, SRSD employs the mnemonic POW+TREE:

• POW: Pick my idea, Organize my notes, Write and say more.
  This overarching strategy teaches students to approach writing systematically, ensuring their ideas are clear and well-organized.

• TREE: Topic sentence, Reasons (3 or more), Explanations for each reason, Ending.
  TREE helps students structure their persuasive essays by emphasizing the inclusion of key genre elements and supporting details, often using mentor texts as models to better connect with their audience.

2. Close Reading Strategies: TWA The study also introduced a close reading strategy, TWA (Think before reading, While reading, After reading), adapted for younger students. This strategy encourages active engagement with informational texts:

• Think before reading: Consider the author’s purpose and your own ideas.
• While reading: Mark up the text to identify relevant facts and ideas.
• After reading: Organize your notes to plan reasons and explanations for your persuasive essay.

By combining POW+TREE with TWA, SRSD creates a cohesive framework for integrating reading and writing skills within the curriculum, helping students enhance their argumentation skills and use evidence effectively to support their arguments.

Key Findings from the Study

The results of Harris et al.’s study were compelling. Here are the highlights that underscore the transformative impact of SRSD:

1. Improved Genre Elements Students’ essays included significantly more genre elements—topic sentences, reasons, explanations, examples, and conclusions—after SRSD instruction. On average, genre element scores tripled, increasing from 7.44 at baseline to 21.79 post-instruction.

2. Enhanced Writing Quality Holistic writing quality improved for all students, reflecting gains in organization, persuasiveness, and clarity. These improvements were evident immediately after instruction and in maintenance probes conducted weeks later.

3. Complexity of Planning Before SRSD, most students either didn’t plan their essays or produced incomplete plans. After instruction, all students created comprehensive, organized plans using a graphic organizer, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the writing process.

4. Adaptability and Confidence Students became more confident and independent writers. By the end of the study, they could mark up texts, plan essays, and write persuasive arguments using persuasive writing techniques without teacher scaffolding.

These findings affirm that SRSD is a practical, scalable approach to addressing the challenges of teaching persuasive writing and rhetoric in diverse classrooms.

Practical Tips for Implementing SRSD in the Classroom

The beauty of SRSD lies in its flexibility and adaptability. Here are actionable strategies to bring SRSD into your classroom:

1. Begin with a Strong Foundation in Persuasive Writing 

Start by developing background knowledge. Use mentor texts to show students what effective persuasive writing looks like. Discuss genre elements and introduce mnemonics like POW+TREE and TWA to provide a clear structure while considering the needs of your audience.

2. Model and Scaffold Strategically 

Demonstrate how to use the strategies through think-alouds, incorporating elements of persuasive writing to enhance student engagement. Show students how to mark up texts, organize their notes, and plan their essays. Gradually release responsibility, providing support as needed while encouraging independence.

3. Incorporate Collaboration 

Create a collaborative writing community. Have students work in pairs or small groups to analyze texts, evaluate sample essays, and co-create plans. Peer feedback and discussion enhance learning and build a sense of camaraderie.

4. Emphasize Self-Regulation 

Teach students to set goals, monitor their progress, and use positive self-talk. Encourage them to celebrate their successes and reflect on areas for growth. This not only improves writing outcomes but also builds resilience and motivation.

5. Make Writing Fun and Engaging 

Use games, visual aids, and interactive activities to keep students engaged. For example, create charts for linking words, brainstorm hooks, or graph students’ progress toward their writing goals.

6. Customize your Writing Instruction Curriculum 

Tailor SRSD to your students’ needs. For younger students or beginners, focus on foundational skills like opinion writing before introducing more complex tasks like writing from sources.

You will find everything you need using the SRSD writing program, Writing to Learn.

A Call to Action for Teachers

The findings underscore a critical truth: all students, regardless of their starting point, can master persuasive writing with the proper support. SRSD offers a robust, research-based framework that equips teachers with the tools to meet today’s writing challenges. By combining close reading with structured writing strategies, SRSD improves academic outcomes and empowers students to think critically and confidently express themselves.

If you’re looking for a way to transform your writing instruction, consider exploring SRSD. Start small—integrate POW+TREE or TWA into your existing practices—and watch your students’ writing soar. Together, we can bridge the gap in writing achievement and ensure every student has the skills they need to succeed. Let’s answer the challenge and unlock the potential of every young writer in our classrooms.

References

Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2017). Self-regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research.
In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 119–151). Leiden: Brill.

Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing-to-read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744.

Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., McKeown, D., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.

Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Brindle, M., & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition and children’s writing. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 131–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ferretti, R. P., & Fan, Y. (2016). Argumentative writing.
In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 301–315). New York, NY: Guilford.

Mason, L. H., Reid, R., & Hagaman, J. (2012). Building comprehension in adolescents: Powerful strategies for improving reading and writing in content areas.
Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010).Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.

Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 5–16.

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58.

Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. New York, NY: Random House.

Self-Regulated Strategy Development Works for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Meta-Review

Writing is a cornerstone of academic success and a fundamental skill for the 21st-century workforce. However, students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) often face substantial barriers to developing effective writing skills. The self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) model is widely recognized as the only evidence-based writing intervention for students with EBD. Yet, questions still need to be answered about its effectiveness across all demographics within this group. Dr. Justin D. Garwood and Dr. Nelson C. Brunsting conducted a meta-review to explore whether SRSD is equally effective for all students with EBD and to identify factors that moderate its effectiveness. This blog delves into their findings, providing insights for educators and researchers alike.

Understanding Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

Students with EBD frequently display externalizing behaviors such as aggression and noncompliance or internalizing behaviors like anxiety and depression, which can significantly impact their mental health. These challenges make it difficult for teachers to provide consistent academic instruction. Academically, students with EBD typically score in the 25th percentile or lower in literacy and mathematics and often fall further behind as they progress through school. These academic struggles correlate with lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and increased likelihood of criminal justice system involvement.

Despite representing approximately 12% of school-aged youth, only 1% of students receive special education services under the EBD classification, underscoring the need for effective emotional and behavioral disorder intervention. This discrepancy highlights significant under-identification, especially for students with internalizing behaviors or those whose challenges do not lead to visible classroom disruptions. Recognizing these challenges, researchers aim to refine interventions like SRSD and incorporate behavioral therapy to support a broader spectrum of students with EBD.

The Significance of SRSD for Students with EBD

SRSD is a research-based instructional model that teaches genre-specific writing strategies while integrating metacognitive techniques like goal-setting, self-monitoring, and self-reinforcement. SRSD consists of six stages:

1. Develop Background Knowledge
2. Discuss It
3. Model It
4. Memorize It
5. Support It
6. Independent Performance

Research supports SRSD as the only evidence-based writing intervention for students with EBD, showing improved writing performance and students’ perceptions of themselves as writers. However, as the current meta-review by Garwood and Brunsting highlights, gaps in the literature and implementation challenges necessitate a closer examination of its effectiveness for diverse students.

Research Questions

Garwood and Brunsting sought to answer two primary questions:

1. How do the demographics of students in SRSD research compare to national statistics for students with EBD?
2. When controlling for implementation fidelity, do factors such as sex, race, special education status, grade level, and intervention agent moderate SRSD’s effectiveness?

Methodology

The meta-review included 18 single-case design studies, each meeting stringent inclusion criteria such as using SRSD for writing, clearly identifying participants with or at risk for EBD, and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The studies were analyzed for demographic representation, fidelity of implementation, assessment methods, and improvement rate differences (IRDs) in writing outcomes.

Key Findings

1. Demographic Gaps in SRSD Research

The review revealed significant demographic disparities in the participants of SRSD studies compared to national statistics:

• Overrepresentation of Caucasian students: 70.7% of participants were Caucasian, compared to 54.3% nationally.
• Underrepresentation of Hispanic/Latino students: Only 2.2% of participants were Hispanic/Latino, compared to 13.7% nationally.
• Exclusion of Native American and Pacific Islander students: These groups were absent from the SRSD research sample despite being included in national statistics.

2. Moderating Variables

The meta-review identified several factors influencing SRSD’s effectiveness:

• Grade Level: Elementary students demonstrated significantly more significant improvements than secondary students, suggesting SRSD may be more effective for younger learners.
• Special Education Status: Students not receiving special education services experienced greater gains, possibly due to fewer behavioral challenges interfering with instruction.
• Intervention Agent: Both researchers and classroom teachers were equally effective in implementing SRSD, underscoring its practicality for school settings.

Implications for Practice and Research: For Educators

Teachers working with students with emotional or behavioral disorders should feel confident in adopting SRSD for writing instruction, as it also addresses aspects of behavioral health and enhances coping and social skills. The intervention’s demonstrated effectiveness across diverse instructional agents makes it a viable choice for general and special education classrooms. Moreover, SRSD aligns well with multi-tiered support systems, particularly as a Tier 2 intervention for students requiring additional help.

For Researchers

The findings highlight critical gaps in SRSD research that must be addressed:

• Inclusion of underrepresented demographics: Future studies should prioritize recruiting participants from Hispanic, Native American, and Pacific Islander backgrounds to ensure SRSD’s effectiveness for all students with EBD.
• Detailed reporting: Researchers should consistently report individual-level data, including race, sex, and grade level, to enable nuanced analyses of intervention outcomes.
• Mixed-methods approach: Combining quantitative and qualitative research methods can provide deeper insights into the factors influencing SRSD’s success and applicability across different contexts.

Limitations

The meta-review acknowledged several limitations:

1. Fidelity Reporting: Many studies reported fidelity at the study level rather than the individual participant level, limiting the precision of analyses.
2. Outcome Measures: Variability in measuring writing outcomes across studies complicated comparisons.
3. Demographic Representation: The absence of diverse participant groups constrained the generalizability of findings.

Conclusion

The meta-review by Garwood and Brunsting affirms SRSD’s status as an evidence-based intervention for improving writing outcomes in students with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD). However, its findings also reveal significant disparities in demographic representation and differential effectiveness among subgroups. Addressing these gaps, potentially through interventions such as counseling and behavioral therapy, is essential to ensuring equity in educational opportunities for all students with or at risk for EBD. SRSD remains a critical tool in the educator’s toolkit, offering hope and tangible strategies to support one of the most vulnerable student populations, while also addressing their mental health needs.

References

1. Garwood, J. D., & Brunsting, N. C. (Year). Does Self-Regulated Strategy Development Work for All Students with and at Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders? A Meta-review focusing on emotional and behavioral disorder intervention.
2. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Policy implications of an evidence-based practice. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 77-84.
3. Losinski, M., Cuenca-Carlino, Y., Zablocki, M., & Teagarden, J. (2014). Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 52-67.
4. Ennis, R. P., & Jolivette, K. (2014). Existing research and future directions for self-regulated strategy development with students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 32-45.
5. Lane, K. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Little, M. A., & Sandmel, K. (2010). Story writing: The effects of self-regulated strategy development for second-grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 44(2), 107-128.
6. Saddler, B., Asaro-Saddler, K., Moeyaert, M., & Ellis-Robinson, T. (2017). Effects of a summarizing strategy on written summaries of children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 87-97.
7. Institute of Education Sciences. (2015). National Center for Education Statistics: U.S. Department of Education Statistics.
8. Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2017). Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth (11th ed.).
9. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 135-150.
10. Ryan, J. B., Pierce, C. D., & Mooney, P. (2008). Evidence-based teaching strategies for students with EBD. Beyond Behavior, 17(1), 22-29.

Unlocking the Power of Writing: How Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) Transforms Outcomes for At-Risk Students

Writing effectively is essential for academic success, workplace readiness, and social engagement, promoting equity for all learners. Despite its importance, writing often receives less instructional time compared to other core areas like reading or math, leaving many students—particularly those in the community with learning disabilities (LD)—struggling to develop the necessary skills. The 2009 study Teaching Writing to At-Risk Students: The Quality of Evidence for Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) by Scott Baker and colleagues provides a comprehensive evaluation of SRSD’s effectiveness in improving writing outcomes for students with and at risk for LD. This blog explores the findings, highlighting the strength of the research supporting SRSD and its potential impact in classrooms.

Writing Challenges for At-Risk Students

Writing is a complex task that requires organizing ideas, applying grammatical rules, and tailoring content to a specific audience. These demands can be particularly overwhelming for students with LD, who often struggle with planning, revising, and sustaining attention during writing tasks, requiring resilience to persist in their learning efforts. National assessments paint a concerning picture: most students with disabilities score at or below basic levels in writing, signaling a need for interventions that directly address these challenges.

The stakes extend beyond academics. Employers frequently report that writing proficiency is critical in the workplace, yet many new employees must gain even basic skills, leading to costly on-the-job remediation. Addressing writing deficits is both an educational and economic imperative.

SRSD: A Research-Validated Writing Intervention

Developed by Drs. Steve Graham and Karen Harris, SRSD is a structured, evidence-based approach that teaches students specific strategies for planning, drafting, and revising their writing. It also integrates self-regulation skills such as goal setting, self-monitoring, and self-reinforcement. SRSD unfolds across six stages specifically designed to support at-risk students:

1. Background Knowledge: Students learn foundational knowledge needed for strategy use.
2. Discussion: The strategy’s purpose and benefits are explained.
3. Modeling: Teachers demonstrate how to apply the strategy.
4. Memorization: Students memorize strategy steps and mnemonics.
5. Support: Teachers scaffold students’ practice as they build proficiency.
6. Independent Use: At-risk students apply the strategy with minimal teacher support.

This comprehensive approach builds writing skills and fosters independence and confidence, empowering at-risk students to tackle writing tasks effectively, even in contexts affected by poverty.

The Study: Evaluating SRSD’s Evidence Base

Baker et al. analyzed five group experimental studies and 16 single-subject studies on SRSD, assessing their adherence to rigorous quality indicators for research. The studies focused on students with LD or those at risk for LD and evaluated SRSD’s impact on writing outcomes such as essay quality, use of genre elements, and writing fluency.

Key Findings from Group Studies

• High-Quality Research: All five group studies met stringent criteria for methodological rigor, including well-documented participant demographics, clear descriptions of interventions, and appropriate data analysis.
• Strong Effect Sizes: The average weighted effect size across the studies was +1.22, indicating a substantial positive impact of SRSD on writing outcomes. This surpasses the threshold for considering an evidence-based intervention.

Insights from Single-Subject Studies

• Broad Validation: Nine of the 16 single-subject studies achieved high methodological ratings, meeting the experimental control and external validity criteria.
• Replicable Success: These studies consistently improved students’ writing across different researchers and settings, especially among at-risk students, further validating SRSD as an evidence-based practice.

Why SRSD Works

The success of SRSD lies in its integration of explicit instruction with self-regulation. Students learn how to write and develop the metacognitive tools to manage the writing process. For example, SRSD teaches at-risk students to set goals, monitor their progress, and reward themselves for completing tasks. These skills are especially beneficial for students with LD, who often face challenges with executive functioning and task persistence.

Another strength of SRSD is its focus on all stages of writing. Unlike traditional approaches emphasizing rote grammar drills or sentence-level corrections, SRSD addresses planning, organization, and revision—critical elements for producing coherent and engaging writing.

Implications for Classroom Practice

SRSD’s robust evidence base makes it an excellent choice for schools seeking to improve writing outcomes for struggling and at-risk students. Here’s how educators can implement SRSD effectively:

1. Professional Development: Teachers need training to deliver SRSD with fidelity. The studies analyzed in this research often included practice-based professional development and ongoing coaching to support teachers.
2. Integration Across Grades: While most SRSD studies have focused on upper elementary and middle school grades, the approach can be adapted for younger and high school students.
3. Tiered Support: SRSD can serve as a core writing program in a multi-tiered system of support within a school. For at-risk students needing additional help, the intensity of instruction can be increased without requiring a new intervention.
4. Alignment with Curriculum: SRSD’s strategies can be integrated into content areas like social studies or science, enabling students to apply their skills across subjects.

Expanding the Research

While SRSD has been extensively studied by its developers and collaborators, more research is needed to examine its implementation by independent teams and at scale. For example, how does SRSD perform when integrated into district-wide professional development programs? What are its long-term effects on students’ academic trajectories? These questions are critical for understanding SRSD’s potential as a large-scale solution for improving writing outcomes.

Conclusion

The study by Baker et al. underscores the robust research foundation supporting SRSD as an evidence-based practice for teaching writing to at-risk students. With its structured yet flexible framework, SRSD equips students with the skills and confidence to succeed as writers, thinkers, and learners. For educators, adopting SRSD represents an opportunity to transform writing instruction and close achievement gaps, ensuring that all students—regardless of their starting point—can unlock the power of writing.

References

Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Graham, S. (2003). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: Research-based applications and examples. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 109–123.

De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997a). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 203–222.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Improving learning disabled students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training. Exceptional Children, 56(3), 201–214.

Hillocks, G., Jr. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 133–170.

Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation(2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476.

Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development for 2nd-grade students who struggle with writing. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340.

MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S. S., & Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6(4), 201–210.

Overcoming Writing Challenges Together

A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing, writing communities are social environments where individuals engage in writing to achieve shared goals and purposes. These communities include the writers and collaborators, mentors, teachers, and readers who interact within a framework shaped by shared norms, tools, and actions.

Why should teachers care about a writing community?

Teachers should care about writing communities because they create an environment where students collaborate, receive feedback, and learn from one another, transforming writing from an isolated task into a meaningful social process. Writing communities help students understand their audience, explore diverse perspectives, and refine their skills through peer and mentor interactions, building confidence and motivation to tackle challenging tasks. 

They also expose students to real-world writing practices, teaching them to use tools, norms, and strategies that prepare them for academic, professional, and personal writing. By fostering critical thinking, effective collaboration, and clear communication, writing communities equip students with essential 21st-century skills. For teachers, these communities provide a structure for differentiation, enabling them to meet diverse student needs through peer feedback and collaborative problem-solving. Ultimately, writing communities enhance the quality of student writing, deepen their engagement, and make the process more rewarding for all learners.

Key Features of Writing Communities:

1. Shared Purpose: Writing communities are formed around specific goals. For example, students in a classroom might focus on improving persuasive essays, while an online fan-fiction group aims to entertain its audience.
2. Membership: Members of a writing community can include writers, readers, collaborators, and mentors. Each member plays a role in the writing process, from providing feedback to shaping content for the intended audience.
3. Social, Cultural, and Historical Contexts: Communities are influenced by macro-level factors like cultural norms, political systems, and historical developments. For example, the goals of a high school writing class will differ from a professional editorial team or a personal journaling group.
4. Collective History: A writing community builds shared practices over time, influencing how members write and interact. These practices might include routines, tools, or values established by the group.
5. Writing Tools: Tools like paper, digital platforms, or multimodal composition software are integral to how writing happens within the community. They can also shape the form and audience reach of the written product.
6. Typified Actions: Communities develop patterns of practice for achieving their writing goals. For instance, a newspaper editorial team might have set brainstorming, drafting, and editing procedures.
7. Social Relationships: The interactions among members influence the community’s dynamics. Supportive relationships can motivate and facilitate collaboration, while conflict can hinder the community’s success.
8. Audience and Communication: Writing is viewed as a communicative act, even in cases where the audience is the writer (e.g., journaling). When composing text, writers consider the audience’s needs, expectations, and interests.

Examples of Writing Communities:

• A second-grade classroom where students learn to write stories to share with peers and parents.
• A workplace group prepares a joint report to present at a board meeting.
• An online forum where hobbyists collaborate to write and participate in a critique circle for creative pieces.

In Graham’s model, writing communities are dynamic and shaped by both internal interactions and external forces. These environments shape what and how individuals write and serve as a catalyst for developing writing skills and understanding over time. For teachers, the concept emphasizes the importance of creating a supportive and purposeful environment where students can practice, share, and improve their writing collaboratively.

The Writer(s)-Within-Community Model: Enhancing Writing Instruction by Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives

Introduction: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Writing

Dr. Steve Graham’s revised Writer(s)-Within-Community (WWC) Model offers a groundbreaking framework for understanding writing as a social and cognitive activity. The model integrates cognitive processes with sociocultural influences, addressing gaps in prior writing theories. While earlier cognitive models, such as those by Hayes and Kellogg, focused on the mental architecture of writing, they often overlooked the impact of social, cultural, and historical contexts. 

Conversely, sociocultural models like activity theory emphasized context but neglected individual cognitive and motivational factors. Dr. Graham’s updated WWC Model bridges these perspectives, proposing that the characteristics of writing communities and the unique capacities of individual writers simultaneously shape writing. This blog will explore the model’s core concepts, practical implications for teachers, and how this perspective can transform writing instruction in K-12 classrooms.

Writing as a Social and Cognitive Activity

The WWC Model conceptualizes writing as a dynamic interaction between two key elements: the writing community and the writers within it. This dual focus highlights the interplay between external influences—cultural, political, and institutional factors—and internal cognitive processes like memory, executive control, and motivation. By understanding these dimensions, teachers can better support students in becoming skilled, confident writers.

Understanding the Writing Community

A writing community comprises writers, collaborators, mentors, teachers, and readers who share common goals and assumptions about writing. These goals range from learning and persuasion to self-expression and collaboration. Writing communities exist in diverse forms, including classrooms, peer writing groups, and professional settings.

Key Features of Writing Communities:

1. Purposes: Writing serves varied functions, from chronicling events to persuading audiences. Teachers can clarify these purposes to help students understand why they write.
2. Members: Writers and readers play distinct but interconnected roles. In classrooms, students collaborate, provide feedback, and learn from mentors, including their teachers.
3. Tools and Actions: Writing tools (e.g., notebooks, digital platforms) and actions (e.g., peer editing) structure how communities achieve their goals.
4. Physical and Social Environments: Writing occurs in physical or digital spaces that shape participation and collaboration.
5. Collective History: Communities develop shared practices over time, such as class-wide rubrics or collaborative storytelling projects.

By analyzing these features, teachers can design writing environments encouraging active participation, mutual support, and skill development.

The Cognitive Dimension: Writers Within Communities

While writing communities provide context, individual writers bring unique cognitive and motivational resources. These include:

• Long-Term Memory (LTM): Writers draw on their knowledge of language, content, and writing strategies stored in LTM.
• Executive Control: Goal setting, planning, monitoring, and revising are central to writing success.
• Working Memory: Writers juggle ideas, audience needs, and sentence construction in this limited-capacity system.
• Beliefs and Motivation: Students’ self-efficacy, attitudes toward writing, and goals significantly influence their performance.

Recognizing these cognitive processes is essential for teachers to scaffold instruction effectively, serving as both a guide and an inspiration for fostering student growth. For example, explicitly teaching goal-setting strategies can help students improve their executive control, while targeted feedback can enhance self-efficacy.

Tenets of the WWC Model: Implications for Teaching

1. Writing Is Shaped by Community and Cognitive Capabilities

Writing emerges from the interaction between community characteristics and individual abilities. For instance, a well-resourced classroom with clear writing goals lets students focus on higher-order skills like argumentation. Conversely, more resources or clear expectations can constrain writing development.

Teaching Tip: Create a classroom writing community with explicit norms, shared goals, and collaborative practices. Incorporate networking opportunities through tools like digital writing platforms to expand access and engagement.

2. Writing Is Shaped by Capacity

The resources and constraints within a writing community and individual students’ abilities determine writing outcomes. Students struggling with working memory may struggle to draft complex sentences in one sitting but can thrive with structured scaffolding.

Teaching Tip: Break writing tasks into manageable chunks. For example, guide students through brainstorming, drafting, and revising in separate sessions, reducing cognitive overload.

3. Writing Reflects Variability

Each writing community and its members, including various authors, exhibit variability in goals, tools, and abilities. In a single classroom, students’ knowledge of writing conventions or their level of engagement can differ widely.

Teaching Tip: Differentiate instruction by providing tiered support. Offer sentence starters for students needing scaffolding while encouraging advanced students to explore complex rhetorical strategies.

4. Writing Development Is Shaped by Interaction

Writing growth depends on community participation and individual knowledge and skills changes. For instance, a student learning to write persuasive essays may improve by observing a peer’s technique or receiving targeted feedback from a teacher.

Teaching Tip: Foster peer collaboration through writing workshops. Encourage students to analyze and discuss each other’s drafts, focusing on strengths and improvement areas.

Practical Strategies for Teachers

Transforming Writing Instruction

Dr. Steve Graham’s Writer(s)-Within-Community Model offers a powerful lens for understanding and teaching writing. Teachers can create vibrant writing communities supporting diverse learners by viewing writing as a social and cognitive activity. Educators can help students develop as writers who thrive within and beyond the classroom through collaborative projects, strategic scaffolding, purposeful feedback, or constructive critiques.

By embracing the principles of the WWC Model, teachers can empower their students to navigate the complexities of writing with confidence, creativity, and competence—laying the foundation for lifelong literacy.

References:

• Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Springer.
• Bazerman, C. (1994). Constructing experience. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Bazerman, C. (2016). What do sociocultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write? In C. Bazerman et al. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 11–27). Guilford Press.
• Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98.
• Freedman, S. W., Hull, G. A., Higgs, J. L., & Booten, K. P. (2016). Teaching writing in a digital and global age: Toward access and inclusion. Harvard Educational Review, 86(4), 518–538.
• Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279.
• Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Erlbaum.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
• Perry, K. H. (2012). What is literacy? A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 50–71.
• Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554.

Reading and writing are often taught as separate subjects, but research consistently reveals that these two literacy skills are profoundly interconnected and mutually supportive. In his article, The Sciences of Reading and Writing Must Become More Fully Integrated, Steve Graham highlights the reciprocal relationship between reading and writing, emphasizing how instruction in one skill enhances the other. Drawing on a robust body of research, including a meta-analysis of 95 studies (Graham & Hebert, 2011), Graham demonstrates that writing about text improves reading comprehension while reading enhances writing quality and fluency. Despite this compelling evidence, Graham notes that current instructional practices often fail to leverage this relationship, leading to missed opportunities for deeper learning. By integrating the science of reading and writing, educators can better prepare students for success in school, work, and life. This article explores this integration’s theoretical and empirical foundations, its implications for instruction, and practical strategies for fostering connected literacy practices.

The Science of Reading and Writing: Current Frameworks

The science of reading delves into how we learn to read, how it impacts cognitive and academic development, and how contextual and environmental factors influence its acquisition. Similarly, the science of writing focuses on understanding the processes and practices that enable individuals to write effectively. Both fields aim to provide evidence-based strategies for instruction, empowering educators to enhance students’ literacy skills. However, in isolation, much of the existing research and instructional practices have been narrowly focused on these skills.

For example, reading instruction often emphasizes the “Big Five” skills: phonological awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension. While these are essential, Graham highlights a significant gap: the need for writing integration to reinforce reading development. Similarly, writing instruction focuses on practices such as planning, drafting, revising, and editing but often overlooks the role of reading in strengthening writing skills.

Reciprocal Benefits of Reading and Writing

Reading and writing are inherently interconnected. Writing provides opportunities for students to analyze and synthesize information, enhancing their text comprehension. Conversely, reading exposes students to diverse text structures, vocabulary, and rhetorical strategies that inform their writing. Graham outlines three theoretical perspectives supporting this reciprocal relationship:

1. Shared Knowledge Theory: Both reading and writing draw on overlapping knowledge bases, such as vocabulary, text structures, and comprehension strategies. For example, understanding the structure of a persuasive essay can aid students in both interpreting and crafting similar texts.
2. Rhetorical Relations Theory: Reading and writing are communicative acts. When students read, they engage with the author’s intended message; when they write, they consider their audience’s needs. This interplay enhances their ability to navigate both roles effectively.
3. Functional Theory: Reading and writing can be used together for specific purposes, such as learning content or improving comprehension. Activities like summarizing a text through writing or analyzing a written argument sharpen both skills.

Evidence for Integration

Empirical evidence underscores the benefits of integrating reading and writing instruction. Graham and Hebert’s 2011 meta-analysis demonstrated that writing activities significantly enhance reading comprehension when paired with the correct syntax. Summarizing texts, note-taking, and extended writing improved students’ understanding of material across grade levels. Writing instruction also enhanced reading fluency and comprehension by helping students develop skills like organizing ideas, understanding semantics, and synthesizing information, which are fundamental aspects of linguistics.

Similarly, a 2018 meta-analysis by Graham and colleagues found that reading interventions positively influenced writing outcomes. Activities like analyzing text structure or engaging with diverse reading materials improved students’ writing quality. These findings affirm that teaching reading and writing in tandem can produce more substantial literacy outcomes than addressing them separately.

Implications for Instruction

The integration of reading and writing offers practical pathways for educators to enhance literacy instruction:

1. Purposeful Writing to Reinforce Reading: Encouraging students to write about what they read—through summaries, opinion pieces, or analytical essays—helps deepen their understanding of the material. For instance, summarizing a historical text not only aids comprehension but also reinforces the ability to convey key information concisely.
2. Reading to Enhance Writing: Exposing students to high-quality texts provides models of effective writing, showcasing different style elements students can incorporate. Teachers can use mentor texts to highlight organizational patterns, stylistic elements, and persuasive techniques, which students can emulate in their writing.
3. Integrated Instructional Units: Designing lessons that pair reading and writing tasks fosters a more cohesive learning experience. For example, a unit on argumentative writing could include analyzing persuasive essays, identifying rhetorical strategies, and crafting original arguments.
4. Balanced Literacy Programs: Programs that allocate equal time to reading and writing instruction yield greater gains in both areas. Research suggests that balancing these practices ensures students receive comprehensive literacy education.

Challenges and Opportunities

Despite the compelling evidence, integrating reading and writing instruction is rare. Several barriers hinder this approach:

• Teacher Preparation: Many educators lack the training to effectively combine reading and writing instruction. Professional development programs must prioritize this integration, equipping teachers with strategies to leverage the reciprocal benefits of these skills.
• Curriculum Design: Traditional curricula often treat reading and writing as separate subjects, limiting opportunities for meaningful connections. Revising curricula to include integrated activities can bridge this gap.
• Policy and Advocacy: Policymakers, administrators, and literacy organizations must champion the importance of connected instruction. With systemic support, educators may be able to implement these practices effectively.

However, these challenges also present opportunities. Graham notes that the digital age offers new tools for integrating reading and writing. Digital platforms that support collaborative writing provide feedback or enhance reading comprehension, which can facilitate innovative instructional approaches.

What is the science of reading and writing?

The science of writing revolves around understanding and applying principles that enhance literacy through integrated reading and writing strategies.

Primarily, this approach emphasizes decoding language structures, enabling learners to comprehend and use language effectively. By merging reading and writing processes, individuals gain better insight into text interpretation and develop more vital communication skills. This synergy fosters a deeper understanding of language use, significantly improving literacy levels.

Further, research indicates that reading and writing are interconnected processes. As individuals engage in reading activities, they absorb information that enhances their ability to construct and articulate their thoughts effectively through writing. This interplay is essential for building literacy foundations that support lifelong learning.

In educational settings, incorporating the science of writing into curricula can transform how students perceive language. By empowering them with the skills necessary for advanced comprehension and communication, educational systems can equip students to meet the challenges of a complex world. Ultimately, integrating these skills promotes an enriching academic experience, fostering a generation equipped with critical literacy tools.

Future Directions

Graham calls for further research and advocacy to maximize the potential of integrated literacy instruction. Critical areas for exploration include:

• Mechanisms of Reciprocity: Understanding how specific reading and writing activities influence each other can refine instructional practices.
• Special Populations: Investigating how integrated instruction benefits students with diverse needs, such as those with learning disabilities or language barriers, is crucial for equity in education.
• Longitudinal Studies: Examining how the reciprocal effects of reading and writing evolve can inform strategies for different developmental stages.
• Digital Integration: Exploring how digital tools can enhance reading and writing connections in modern classrooms can pave the way for innovative practices.

A Call to Action

The science of writing, like the science of reading, has provided invaluable insights into literacy development. However, as Graham argues, these fields must move beyond isolated approaches to embrace a more integrated model. Educators can foster deeper learning and more vital literacy skills by leveraging the reciprocal relationship between reading and writing. This integration is not just a theoretical ideal but a practical necessity for preparing students to succeed in a literacy-driven world.

Educators, researchers, and policymakers must champion the integration of reading and writing in classrooms. Together, they can ensure that literacy instruction reflects the interconnected nature of these essential skills, transforming how students learn and grow as readers and writers.

References

1. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 13–37). Boston, MA: Brill.
2. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
3. Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2018). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
4. Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., … Talukdar, J. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927
5. Hebert, M., Simpson, A., & Graham, S. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 26, 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9386-3
6. Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
7. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
8. Graham, S., Bruch, J., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L., Furgeson, J., Greene, K., & Smither Wulsin, C. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017-4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Transforming Classroom Writing Instruction with SRSD

Improving student writing matters because writing is not just a skill for the classroom; it’s a critical tool for learning, communication, and self-expression. When students develop their writing abilities, especially through online platforms, they gain the power to articulate their thoughts, explore ideas, and engage in meaningful dialogue with others. Strong writing skills enhance learning across all subjects, enabling students to effectively organize their ideas, analyze information, and present arguments. Beyond school, writing remains essential in most career paths, whether composing emails, drafting reports, or sharing insights. 

When we think about teaching writing, it’s often easy to focus on grammar, spelling, or sentence structure and overlook the depth of thought and organization that go into a truly effective writing process. Many teachers report being unprepared to teach writing effectively despite recognizing its importance for students’ academic success and life skills. This is where Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) shines as a game-changing instructional approach.

Dr. Karen Harris, a leading developer of SRSD, frames this method as one that empowers teachers with practical, research-backed tools to transform how students approach and succeed in writing. It’s more than just another writing program; SRSD combines writing strategies with self-regulation skills, fostering not just capable writers but confident, independent thinkers. Here’s a closer look at why SRSD matters, its unique benefits for teachers, and how it has sparked enthusiasm in young writers who used to struggle.

Why Writing Instruction Needs SRSD: Insights from the Classroom

Writing instruction and writing courses haven’t always been a priority in teacher preparation programs, leaving many educators feeling underprepared to teach writing in depth. Even in the 1980s and 90s, there was an apparent demand for better instructional methods. During this time, Donald Graves, the father of the writer’s workshop, pioneered the process-writing approach. While this led to increased writing in classrooms, it didn’t necessarily yield stronger writing. By 1995, Graves pointed out that while more students were writing, the quality hadn’t substantially improved.

This is precisely where SRSD comes into play. Designed to provide teachers with a solid foundation for teaching writing, SRSD bridges the gap between simply having students write and helping them become skilled, independent writers. As Dr. Harris describes, SRSD is an evidence-based, flexible framework that equips teachers with the tools to “rift and twist” the material, adapting to various classroom needs and supporting diverse learners. This adaptability is essential for teachers in dynamic classroom settings, where they must cater to students with varying skill levels, backgrounds, and learning needs.

Turning Writing from “Broccoli” into “Ice Cream”

For many students, writing can feel like a chore—something tedious and unappealing, much like broccoli to a child, when instead it could be an opportunity to unleash creativity. SRSD changes this by making writing an exciting and achievable task, building students’ confidence and skills. The effectiveness of SRSD has led students to explore writing as something they genuinely enjoy, like an ice cream sundae. After learning SRSD strategies, a second grader told her mother she now loves writing and feels “really good at it.” This transformative effect comes from SRSD’s structured approach, where students are taught not only what to write but how to approach writing in a manageable and rewarding way.

The Core of SRSD: Evidence-Based and Student-Centered

SRSD is the only instructional method for writing that the What Works Clearinghouse deems evidence-based, a recognition backed by over 100 studies conducted across grades and with students of varying abilities. SRSD provides a strategic framework that combines specific writing strategies with self-regulation techniques like goal-setting, self-monitoring, and self-assessment. This dual focus on writing skills and self-regulation gives students a sense of control and ownership over their work, empowering them to tackle even complex writing tasks confidently.

SRSD includes six instructional stages that provide a clear, gradual path to independence:

1. Developing Background Knowledge – Students build foundational knowledge for understanding and using writing strategies.
2. Discussing the Strategy – Teachers and students discuss the purpose and benefits of the strategy, emphasizing its relevance to real-life writing tasks.
3. Modeling the Strategy – Teachers demonstrate the writing and self-regulation strategies, showing students how to think critically and plan their writing.
4. Memorizing the Strategy – Students learn to recall the strategy independently, practicing until it becomes second nature.
5. Supporting Student Use – Teachers guide students as they apply the strategy, offering feedback and adjustments as needed.
6. Independent Performance – Finally, students reach the point of using the strategy independently, building their confidence and competence as writers.

Through these stages, SRSD offers more than just rote learning. The framework encourages active, engaging, and collaborative lessons that foster a positive attitude toward writing.

Making Writing Manageable for Students and Teachers Alike

The SRSD approach is highly adaptable, making it practical for teachers and beneficial for students across different grade levels and writing abilities. This flexibility is essential in today’s classrooms, where teachers work with diverse groups of students, including those with learning disabilities, language barriers, or varying levels of confidence in writing.

For instance, SRSD’s versatility allows it to be applied to different genres, from opinion essays in lower grades to persuasive writing using informational text for older students. In one example, fourth- and fifth-graders learned to craft strong narratives and persuasive essays using SRSD techniques. They started with the basics of opinion writing and gradually integrated more complex elements, such as citing informational texts to support their arguments. This step-by-step approach makes writing more manageable and teaches students to build on their existing skills over time.

Building Writing Skills That Last

A critical aspect of SRSD is its focus on long-term skill retention and generalizing writing strategies. In other words, SRSD equips students with skills they can apply to different writing tasks across subjects and over time. To ensure these strategies stick, SRSD encourages maintenance, editing, and generalization through practices like:

• Setting individualized goals for each student’s writing journey, encouraging them to strive for ongoing improvement
• Promoting positive self-assessment, where students learn to review their work critically and set new personal goals
• Providing frequent feedback keeps students engaged and motivated to refine their writing

For teachers, SRSD provides a framework to help students reach beyond the classroom and apply their skills to real-world scenarios. This valuable outcome keeps students engaged and invested in their learning.

SRSD in Practice: Meeting Common Core Standards

SRSD also aligns well with the Common Core’s emphasis on persuasive and informative writing, helping students learn to support their positions with well-organized, logical arguments. The Common Core outlines clear goals for writing that SRSD can help achieve, such as crafting persuasive essays that are coherent, evidence-based, and engaging.

In SRSD instruction, students learn to structure their writing with mnemonics like POW (Pick an idea, Organize notes, Write and say more) and TREE (Topic sentence, Reasons, Ending, Examine). These memory aids help students internalize the writing process, supporting them in planning, organizing, and elaborating on their ideas. When used in conjunction with close reading skills, such as those taught with the TWA (Think before reading, while reading, and After reading) strategy, SRSD helps students build a solid writing structure and fosters critical thinking and reasoning.

Encouraging Lifelong Writers and Learners

SRSD goes beyond helping students write better in the classroom; it equips them with lifelong skills. Good writing remains essential beyond school years, whether in higher education or in most career paths. Over 90% of white-collar and 80% of blue-collar workers report that writing skills are crucial to their success. SRSD instills in students a foundation of skills that carry into these real-world applications, making it a valuable tool for academic achievement and long-term success.

Why SRSD Should Matter to Every Educator

At its core, SRSD is about giving students a voice. By helping them articulate their thoughts and ideas through storytelling, SRSD empowers them to become confident communicators. Teachers care deeply about their students’ success, and SRSD provides a way to fulfill that commitment by transforming writing instruction into something accessible, effective, and enjoyable. Dr. Harris notes, “When teachers find a powerful tool, they want to use it.”

SRSD has already proven to turn reluctant writers into enthusiastic ones by incorporating online writing courses, transforming writing from a dreaded task into a meaningful and satisfying endeavor. It’s more than just broccoli—it’s the ice cream sundae of writing instruction, making learning enjoyable, impactful, and sustainable.