Explicit Writing Instruction: SRSD Writing Lessons for Today’s Teachers

Benefits of Structured Writing Approaches Building on Engelmann’s Legacy

In my last blog, I explored how Siegfried Engelmann’s design principles, clarity, sequencing, and evidence-based lesson design parallel the Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) structure. Engelmann proved that lesson design matters. If instruction isn’t engineered with precision, students are left behind.

But Engelmann’s approach wasn’t perfect. Critics argued that, while powerful, Direct Instruction (DI) sometimes felt too rigid. Teachers reported that scripted lessons reduced their opportunity to use their professional skills and autonomy. Others worried DI’s focus on whole-class mastery left little room for differentiation. And many schools balked at the cost of consumable workbooks tied narrowly to literacy programs.

SRSD keeps Engelmann’s rigor but updates it for today’s classrooms by incorporating techniques from the Hochman Method. It adds what modern teachers and students need most: self-regulation, flexibility, and sustainability.

What Critics Said About Engelmann

Engelmann’s work was revolutionary, but no approach is beyond critique. Teachers often raised three concerns:

Too Scripted In some classrooms, DI was so tightly scripted that teachers felt like actors reading lines. One Queensland teacher described it bluntly: “I felt like a robot. I wasn’t teaching anymore; I was performing someone else’s words. “While the structure produced results, it also risked alienating professionals who value creativity and responsiveness.

Whole-Class Mastery DI tended to move entire classes forward at the same pace. That worked for many, but not all. Advanced students could feel bored, while those who struggled sometimes needed more scaffolding. Teachers craved tools to flex instruction without breaking fidelity.

Costly, Siloed Materials DI programs often came packaged with consumable student workbooks and teacher guides that had to be repurchased each year. They were also narrowly tied to literacy or numeracy, making them harder to integrate across the curriculum.

These criticisms didn’t diminish Engelmann’s impact. Still, they highlighted the need for a next-generation approach that preserved design rigor while addressing teacher autonomy, differentiation, cost, and incorporating regular feedback from both teachers and students.

How SRSD Extends Engelmann’s Principles

This is where SRSD shines. Developed by Karen Harris and Steve Graham, SRSD builds on Engelmann’s foundation while expanding it to meet the realities of modern classrooms.

Self-Regulation & Goal Setting Unlike DI, which focuses mainly on task execution, SRSD teaches students to manage themselves as writers. Students learn to set personal goals, monitor progress, and use self-talk to stay motivated. A sixth-grade student put it this way: “When I get stuck now, I tell myself to use POW and TREE. It’s like I’ve got a plan inside my head.”

Differentiation SRSD is designed for flexibility. Teachers can implement strategies with the whole class, small groups, or individual students. The model grows with students, making it far less rigid than DI.

Professional Judgment Instead of word-for-word scripts, SRSD Online lessons provide “meta scripts”, structured guidance, and think-aloud examples that teachers can adapt. As Harris & Graham argued, SRSD trusts teachers’ expertise to decide how and when to adjust the pacing or language (source).

Collaboration SRSD encourages peer-to-peer scaffolding. Students brainstorm together, share strategies, and even use their own language to co-construct essays. This collaborative aspect was largely absent in Engelmann’s DI but is critical for building classroom community and engagement.

Sustainability Instead of consumable workbooks, SRSD Online provides teachers with lifetime licenses and downloadable resources. Teachers aren’t locked into annual repurchasing cycles and can revisit materials whenever needed.

Broader Impact Perhaps most importantly, SRSD isn’t just about writing. Teaching students to plan, monitor, and revise strengthens reading comprehension and content-area learning. Students apply SRSD strategies in science reports, history analyses, and math explanations.

An Australian Lens That Translates Everywhere

The Australian teaching context makes SRSD’s extensions especially relevant.

Workload and Burnout The Grattan Institute reports that 92% of teachers feel they don’t have enough time for effective lesson preparation. Teachers spend, on average, six hours each week creating or sourcing materials, and a quarter spend more than ten. This workload contributes directly to burnout and turnover.

SRSD reduces this burden. Instead of cobbling lessons together, teachers can access fully developed routines, then spend their energy on delivery and adaptation.

Curriculum Integration
SRSD aligns seamlessly with the priorities of the Australian Curriculum (ACARA). It supports General Capabilities such as literacy, critical and creative thinking, and personal and social capability. It also works well with EAL/D frameworks, giving teachers clear scaffolds for students learning English.

In the United States, SRSD integrates with Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts by directly addressing writing, reading, and language anchor standards. Teachers have successfully used SRSD strategies like TREE and TIDE within widely adopted programs, and the framework is also recognized in the What Works Clearinghouse as an evidence-based practice.

In Canada, SRSD dovetails with provincial priorities such as Ontario’s Language Curriculum and the literacy outcomes measured by the EQAO assessments. Because SRSD emphasizes explicit strategy instruction and self-regulation, it supports the foundational writing expectations and the broader cross-curricular competencies emphasized in Canadian classrooms, including critical thinking and communication skills.

NAPLAN Readiness Every Australian teacher knows the pressure of NAPLAN writing tasks. With SRSD, students don’t just practice random prompts; they learn structured planning strategies like TREE and TIDE that they can apply under timed conditions. One Sydney student explained after an SRSD lesson: “Before, I’d stare at the page. Now, I just start with POW and I know what to do next.”

Why SRSD Is the 2025 Gold Standard

In the 1970s–1990s, Engelmann’s DI was rightly considered the gold standard for explicit instruction. But education has evolved.

Today, SRSD is the gold standard for writing instruction:

• Evidence-Based: Recognized by the What Works Clearinghouse as a proven intervention.
• Meta-Analytic Support: Decades of meta-analyses show large effects on writing quality, motivation, and self-regulation.
• Global Reach: SRSD is now implemented in over 20 countries, including Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and Canada.

Where Engelmann engineered lessons for consistency, SRSD modernizes the model, blending explicit instruction with self-regulation, collaboration, and adaptability.

Conclusion

SRSD doesn’t discard Engelmann’s legacy; it builds on it. It keeps the clarity, sequencing, and evidence-based approach that made DI effective, while addressing the realities of modern classrooms. The call is simple: stop DIY’ing writing lessons. Explore SRSD Online, join the evidence-based writing movement, and bring explicit, adaptive, and sustainable instruction to your classroom.

---