The History of SRSD: Evolution of the Science of Writing

Pioneers and Key Figures in SRSD Development

Key Milestones in SRSD Development

The Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) model is now widely recognized as the most effective approach for teaching writing. Still, its successful implementation requires a deep understanding of its principles and strategies. Understanding the history of SRSD and the journey that led to its creation provides valuable insight into how SRSD became a powerful educational model deeply grounded in theoretical research and practical application.

Part I of this three-part blog series will explore the early influences, theoretical foundations, and critical principles that shaped SRSD. These blogs were written from Karen Harris’ Study: The Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instructional Model: Efficacious Theoretical Integration, Scaling Up, Challenges, and Future Research, published in September 2024.

Let’s start with the Origins of SRSD: A Journey Toward More Effective Writing Instruction.

The Early SRSD Foundations: A Response to a Need

The development of SRSD did not follow the traditional path of theoretical research in educational psychology, where a framework or hypothesis leads to experimentation and refinement. Instead, SRSD was born out of an urgent need: how to help students struggling with writing, particularly those marginalized by learning disabilities, poverty, and other forms of oppression.

Karen Harris, the principal creator of SRSD, recounts how her journey as an educator began in high school, where she tutored children in an inner-city environment, emphasizing the importance of effective planning in instructional approaches. It was here that she first encountered the systemic issues faced by children in impoverished neighborhoods. These early experiences ignited her passion for creating more effective instructional approaches to support children left behind by traditional educational methods.

Later, Harris’s early career teaching experience in an Appalachian coal-mining town reinforced her desire to improve educational practices. Teaching fourth graders who were significantly behind in reading and writing, Harris noticed how little her students were engaged with the standard curriculum, recognizing the importance of writing to learn as a tool for deeper engagement. This further motivated her to develop an instructional model that could empower struggling students to improve their writing skills.

The Role of Life Space and Civil Rights Movements

A pivotal moment in Harris’s career was her introduction to the concept of life space, a psychological construct emerging from Kurt Lewin’s work. Life space combines all environmental and personal factors that influence an individual’s behavior at any given time. For Harris, life space represented the broader social, cultural, and economic contexts that shaped her students’ learning experiences. This idea would later form the theoretical backbone of SRSD, where instruction would be responsive to the individual learner’s unique life experiences and challenges.

Moreover, Harris’s exposure to the Civil Rights Movement, which sought to abolish racial segregation and promote the rights of marginalized groups, profoundly influenced her educational philosophy. She became committed to using education for social justice and equity, believing that improving writing instruction for all students—especially those from underserved communities—was key to achieving social change.

The Influence of Cognitive Behavioral Modification (CBM) on SRSD

One of the most significant theoretical influences on the development of SRSD came from Donald Meichenbaum’s work on Cognitive-Behavioral Modification (CBM). Meichenbaum’s model emphasizes the integration of affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social theories to help children develop strategies for learning and behavior. Harris saw CBM as a potential blueprint for integrating effective instructional practices into one cohesive model, emphasizing the importance of its implementation in the context of Self-Regulated Strategy Development. 

CBM laid the groundwork for SRSD’s interactive learning approach, where teachers and students collaborate closely, integrating insights from the history of SRSD. Meichenbaum’s focus on developing self-regulation skills, such as goal setting, self-monitoring, and self-reinforcement, also became central to SRSD’s instructional practices. 

Harris’s study of Meichenbaum’s work led her to believe that instructional models could and should integrate multiple theoretical frameworks. She was particularly interested in blending elements of behavioral theory, cognitive psychology, developmental theory, and social learning theory, as well as meticulous planning, to create a comprehensive instructional model for teaching writing.

Integrating Multiple Theories: The Birth of SRSD

As Harris began her doctoral work at Auburn University in 1981, her quest to integrate various theories into a cohesive instructional framework took shape. She was particularly drawn to the work of Vygotsky, who emphasized the role of social interaction in cognitive development. Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)—the idea that learners can achieve more with guidance than they can independently—became a fundamental tenet of SRSD.

Cognitive and social theories did not solely influence SRSD; behavioral approaches, such as scaffolding and gradual release of responsibility, played an essential role. Harris understood that teaching students writing strategies and self-regulation skills needed to be scaffolded carefully to ensure that students could eventually use these skills independently. This led to creating the six recursive stages of Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) instruction, where students progressively take more responsibility for their writing.

In addition to CBM and Vygotsky’s work, Harris drew on research from educational psychology, special education, and general education to refine SRSD. This interdisciplinary approach allowed SRSD to address the cognitive, emotional, and social aspects of learning to write—a process that requires constant self-regulation.

Self-Regulation as the Core of SRSD

At the heart of SRSD is the belief that students must become active participants in their learning. To accomplish this, SRSD focuses on teaching students to self-regulate their writing process. Self-regulation involves setting goals, using self-instructions to guide behavior, monitoring progress, and rewarding oneself for success.

The self-regulatory components of SRSD draw heavily from Meichenbaum’s work on self-instructional training, where students learn to direct their thoughts and behaviors toward achieving academic goals. In SRSD, students are taught to use specific writing strategies and cognitive processes to plan, write, and revise their work, emphasizing the importance of planning throughout the writing process. However, they are also encouraged to develop personalized self-instructions that help them manage the emotional and cognitive demands of writing.

For example, students might use positive self-talk to overcome writing anxiety, such as reminding themselves, “I know what I’m doing,” or “I can break this down step by step.” By learning to monitor their progress and adjust when necessary, students gain confidence in their writing abilities, which leads to higher levels of motivation and perseverance.

Building an Evidence Base for SRSD

Once the basic framework for SRSD was established, Harris and her colleague, Steve Graham, began testing the model in various settings. Their first study, conducted in the early 1980s, involved teaching students with learning disabilities how to use effective vocabulary in story writing. The study yielded positive results, with students showing meaningful improvements in writing quality and self-regulation, demonstrating the value of writing to learn.

Over the next several decades, Self-Regulated Strategy Development was refined through multiple iterations, research studies, and carefully planned implementation. Today, a large body of evidence supports the effectiveness of SRSD in improving writing outcomes for students across a range of grade levels and abilities. Research has shown that SRSD leads to moderate to large effect sizes in writing quality, genre-specific writing skills, and self-regulation of the writing process.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD)

While SRSD has achieved widespread recognition and success, challenges remain in scaling up its use in schools. Harris has pointed to significant hurdles, such as paradigm wars in writing instruction and teachers’ lack of professional development. However, she remains optimistic that SRSD can continue to evolve and adapt to meet all students’ needs, particularly those historically marginalized.

In my next blog, I will explore Karen Harris’s theoretical triangulation behind SRSD and how this integration of multiple theories has shaped the development of Self-Regulated Strategy Development.

About the Author